EME 5055
Trends and Issues in
Instructional Design & Technology
Reading List

 

Unit I: Definitions and History | Questions

Unit II: Recent Trends and Issues

Performance Technology
Change Management
Total Quality Management
Constructivism/Anchored Instruction/
Situated Cognition (Part 1)

Cooperative Learning (Part 1)
Multimedia
Electronic Performance Support
Systems (Part 1)

Distance learning (Part 1)
Mastery Learning | Reading questions

School Restructuring
What Designers Really Do
New Approaches to ID (and some
reactions to them!)

Constructivism/Anchored Instruction/
Situated Cognition (Part 2)

Electronic Performance Support
Systems (Part 2)

Cooperative Learning (Part 2)
Distance Education (Part 2)
Levels of Evaluation


Home

 

 

 

 

Unit I: Definitions and History

 

1. Reiser, R.A. (in press). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (Eds). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

2. Gustafson, K. (1991). Survey of instructional development models. (2nd ed.) Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. Foreword, & pp. 1 -3.

3. Dick, W., and Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. (4th. ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, pp. 2-8.

4. Kearsley, G. (1984). Training and technology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 83-88.

5. Gustafson, K.L., and Tillman, M.H. (1991). Introduction. In Briggs, Gustafson, & Tillman (Eds.), Instructional design: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology. pp. 3 - 8.

6. & 7. (deleted from reading list)

8. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: Classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 9 - 40, 51 - 71, 104 - 109.

9. Dick, W. (1987). A history of instructional design and its impact on educational psychology. In J.A. Glover and R. R. Ronning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology. New York: Plenum, pp. 183 - 192.

 

 

 

Unit II: Recent Trends and Issues

Performance Technology

 

10. Medsker, K., Hunter, P., Stepich, D., & Rowland, G. (1995).HPT in academic curricula: Survey results. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4), pp. 6 & 8.

11. Rosenberg, M.J., (1990). Performance technology: Working the system. Training, pp. 43-48.

12. Rossett, A. (1992). Performance technology for instructional technologists: Comparisons and possibilities. Performance & Instruction, 31, pp. 16- 19.

13. Dean, P.J. (1995). Examining the practice of human performance technology. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(2), pp. 68, 79 - 80.

 

Change Management

 

14. Will be handed out in class.

 

Total Quality Management

 

15. Macchia, P. (1992). Total quality education and instructional systems development. Educational Technology, 32(7), 17 - 18.

 

Constructivism/Anchored Instruction/Situated Cognition (Part 1)

 

16. Cunningham, D.J. (1991). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue. Educational Technology, 31, (5), 13 - 17.

17. Wilson, B. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology, 4 - 7.

18. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33(3), pp. 52, 54, & 58.

19. Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer's view of constructivism. Educational Technology, 31, (5), 41-44.

Also see readings 41 & 42

 

Cooperative Learning (Part 1)

 

20. Johnson, D. Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty productivity. Washington, D.C. ERIC.
pp. 15 - 25.

Also see reading 44

 

Multimedia

 

21. Galbreath, J. (1992). The educational buzzword of the 1990's. Educational Technology, 32, (4), 15-16.

22. Dahmer, B. (1993). When technologies connect. Training and Development, 47 (1), pp. 46 & 48.

 

Electronic Performance Support Systems (Part 1)

 

23. Carr, C. (1992). PSS! Help when you need it. Training and Development. 46(6), 31-38.

24. Wager, W.W., & Mckay, J. (in press). EPSS: Visions and viewpoints. In Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (Eds.). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

• Also see reading 43

 

Distance learning (Part 1)

 

25. Articles will be given out in class

Also see reading 45

 

Mastery Learning

 

26. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 725 - 730.

27. Bloom, B.S. (1968). Learning for mastery. In B.S. Bloom, J.T. Hastings, & G.F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 43, 51.

28. (deleted from reading list)

29. Kulik, C.L.C., Kulik, J.A., & Bangert-Drowns, R.L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60, pp. 265-266, 271-286, 292.

30. Dennis, V.E., & Gruner, D. (1992) Computer managed instruction at Arthur Andersen & Company. Educational Technology, 32(3), 7 - 8, 14 - 15.

 

School Restructuring

 

31. Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). The imperative for systemic change. Educational Technology, 32(11), 9-13.

32. Reiser R. A., & Butzin, S.M. (1998).Project TEAMS: Integrating technology into middle school instruction. TechTrends, 43(2), 39 - 44.

33. Cuban, L. (1992). Computers meet classroom, Classroom wins. Education Week, November 11, 1992.

 

What Designers Really Do

 

34. Zemke, R. (1985). The systems approach: A nice theory but. . . Training, October, 103-108.

35. Dick, W. (1995). Instructional design and creativity: A response to the critics. Educational Technology, 35(4), 9-10.

 

New Approaches to ID (and some reactions to them!)

 

36. Dick, W. (1993). Enhanced ISD: A response to changing environments for learning and performance. Educational Technology, 33(2), 12-16.

37. Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade? Educational technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55 - 63.

38. Gustafson, K. L. (in press). The future of instructional design. In Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (Eds.). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

39. (Deleted from reading list.)

40. Merrill, M.D. et al. (1998). Wake Up! (and reclaim instructional design). Training, June, 1998 pp. 36 - 42. 

 

Constructivism/Anchored Instruction/Situated Cognition (Part 2)

 

41. Savery, J.R., & Duffy, T.M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructionivist framework. Educational Technology: 35(5), 31 - 34.

42. Bostock, S. J. (1998). Constructivism in mass higher education: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 226 - 227.

 

Electronic Performance Support Systems (Part 2)

 

43. Chiero, R.T. (1996). Electronic Performance Support Systems: A new opportunity to enhance teacher effectiveness? Action in Teacher Education, 17(4), 37 - 44.

 

Cooperative Learning (Part 2)

 

44. Jacobs, G.M., & James, J.E. (1994) A comparison of workplace groups with groups in education. Paper presented at the meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Baltimore. pp 1 - 8.

 

Distance Education (Part 2)

 

45. Snow, J. (1998). Classrooms without walls: Three companies that took the plunge. Training and Development, 52(9), 39 - 41.

 

Levels of Evaluation

46. Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Training and Development, 50(1), 54 - 59.

 

 

Knowledge Management

 

47. Rossett, A. (1999) Knowledge management meets analysis. Training and Development, 53(5) 62 -

 

 

Getting a job as an Instructional Designer

 

Readings will be handed out in class.

Back to Top