|
|||
Bird points to top of magnet where experiments will be lowered into the bore, or center. |
FSU's new magnet is biggest everBy Amy Olk
|
![]() |
|
|
The strength of a magnetic field is measured in tesla and gauss: One tesla equals 10,000 gauss. At sea level, the earth generates a magnetic field of about 1/2 gauss, or 1/20,000 of a tesla. So how does a 45 tesla magnet compare to a refrigerator magnet? John Miller, project leader for the 45-T Hybrid, allows the
comparison, but warns that the comparative strength of magnetic
fields cannot be conceived of in linear terms: A 2-T magnet is
not simply two times stronger than a 1-T magnet. "The Hybrid is really almost 8 trillion times stronger than a very strong refrigerator magnet," says Miller. And the Hybrid is a different kind of magnet. There are basically two types: permanent magnets and electromagnets. Permanent magnets include refrigerator magnets, bar magnets and the magnets you find in games. And whereas permanent magnets have a constant magnetic field,
electromagnets, which derive their magnetic field from an electric
current, can be turned on and off. Common examples of electromagnets
are the solenoids in an automobile, magnetic door locks or the
magnets used in junkyards to pick up cars and refrigerators -
which might go as high as half a tesla. The 45-T Hybrid itself is made up of two types of electromagnets: a resistive electromagnet ("resistive" meaning that the metals the magnet is made up of have electrical resistance, thus requiring voltage, or power) and a superconducting magnet that has no resistance and requires virtually no power once it's running. The Hybrid is a cylinder seven feet in diameter, with the
resistive magnet in the center and the superconducting magnet
forming the outside layer, or "outsert." When the Hybrid
is turned on, the intense magnetic field is concentrated in a
small hole, called a bore, in the center of the magnet. The bore
is 32 mm (an inch and an eighth) wide - a tiny space in a giant
mass of metal. In anticipation of the magnet's completion in October, he and a team of students prepared an experiment with four tiny samples of matter, all of which fit within one square centimeter (less than half an inch). "It reminds me a little bit of the kids waiting for the
new Star Wars film," says Brooks. "We feel like we've
been camping outside the 'Hybrid Theater' for months with our
experiments in hand." The wires run up through the probe to sophisticated volt meters,
which are connected to a computer. As the samples are subjected
to the 45-T magnetic field, Brooks and his students will be able
to read the data on the computer screen as it evolves. Such experiments add to scientists' knowledge of the behavior of matter on the atomic scale, which can lead to many practical applications. The materials Brooks and his students are studying are candidates for new electronic and magnetic devices, such as sensors and memory storage devices. Brooks waxes poetic when he speaks of the power of a 45 tesla
magnetic field. Hybrid magnets have traditionally been built with their controls on top, cluttering the space around the bore and making it difficult to install and monitor experiments. Mark Bird, an associate scholar/scientist with the Magnet Lab, points toward the magnet's top, which looks like a shiny, silver disk with a small hole in the middle. "You see, the top of the magnet's flat - there are no
obstacles here. There will be a deck put down ... so that people
will be able to just walk up and install their experiments."
Because the Hybrid requires so much power, it will be the only magnet running when it is in use. Operating costs are always a concern when building a new magnet - the Magnet Lab already pays an annual electric bill of about $2.7 million, nearly 60 percent of which goes toward powering the lab's seven resistive magnets. "As we design the next generation of hybrid magnets for this laboratory, we will be taking (the issue of cost) very seriously," Miller says. "The present plan is to demonstrate that hybrids can serve today's typical user . . . with all the flexibility and ease of use of present day resistive magnets, while requiring only about 1/3 the power and tying up only a single module of the laboratory's DC power supply." Because superconducting magnets consume virtually no power, combining superconducting materials with traditional resistive technology, as was done with the Hybrid, is one way to reduce operational costs. However, superconducting magnets are much more expensive to build. (There are also intrinsic limits to how high a magnetic field they can reach before they stop superconducting). As Bird puts it, "If you're sure you'll be able to get
the operating money, but you're not sure you can get the capital
money, you might put as much as you can into the resistive part.
As far as a purely technical approach (to building a hybrid magnet)
goes, people have different philosophies, but it basically comes
down to how the funding works." Despite having set yet another world record with the 45-T Hybrid, researchers like Bird and Miller are not likely to be resting on their laurels in the face of ongoing, international competition to develop new and better technology for magnet-related research. As for the 45-T Hybrid, says Miller, "Its value will be extended. From the start, the superconducting outsert was designed to accept an insert capable of pushing the envelope to 50T." However, he points out that building more powerful magnets in the future may require a whole new approach to magnet design. If such change is to take place anywhere, the aptly named Innovation Park, where the Magnet Lab is located, seems a likely place for a revolution to begin. The 330,000-square-foot Magnet Lab at FSU is the world's largest
and highest-powered magnet laboratory, with a 40-million-watt
power supply (10 percent of Tallahassee's total generating capacity).
It is the main complex of the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory
(NHMFL), a federal-state partnership supported by the National
Science Foundation and the state of Florida and operated by FSU,
the University of Florida and Los Alamos National Laboratory.
|
|||
Send a letter to the Editor:fstimes@unicomm.fsu.eduCopyright ©1999 Florida State Times |
|||