| Adult Education and Human Resource Development program | ||
![]() |
||
| College of Education » The Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies | ||
ADE 5932r e-Learning for Managers (3 hours)The Florida State University
|
Week 1 |
Topic: The Potential of e-Learning Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). Chapter 1: Learning is a Lot More than Training, and Chapter 2: The E-Learning Revolution. Assignment: Complete the icebreaker activity. Respond to discussion activities. Explore the Online Resources in Rosenberg, pp. 327-328. |
Week 2 |
Topic: The Convergence of E-Learning, Knowledge Management and Performance Support Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). Chapter 3: Why Most CBT Doesn't Work and How It Can Be Better, and Chapter 4: Knowledge Management: When Information is Better than Instruction. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. |
Week 3 |
Topic: Preparing the Organization for E-Learning Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). Chapter 7: Integrating The Four C's of Success: Culture, Champions, Communication and Change, and Chapter 8: Justifying E-Learning to Top Management…and to Yourself. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Complete Part I of the Application Project - Organizational Description and upload to the Gradebook. |
Week 4 |
Topics: Blending E-Learning into the Training Organization Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). Chapter 5: Integrating E-Learning and Classroom Learning and Chapter 9: Reinventing the Training Organization. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Complete Case Study #1. |
Week 5 |
Topic: Strategizing E-learning Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001), Chapter 10: Navigating the Vendor Marketplace, Chapter 11, E-learning on a Shoestring, and Chapter 12: Creating Your E-Learning Strategy and Appendix A: The E-Learning "Top 20" - 20 Strategic Questions You Must Answer About the Sustainability of Your E-Learning Efforts. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Complete Part II of the Application Project - Application to Organization and upload to the Gradebook |
Week 6 |
Topic: Building the Infrastructure for E-Learning Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). Chapter 6: Building and Managing an E-Learning Infrastructure and Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 1: People First, Chapter 2: Types of e-Learning and the Technologies Required, Chapter 3: Categories of Tools. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Case Study #2. |
Week 7 |
Topic: Selecting Tools and Technologies Readings: Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 19: Strategies for Picking Technologies, Chapter 20, Picking Tools, and Chapter 21: General Criteria for Picking Tools. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Begin working on Part III of the Application Project - E-Learning Plan for Organization. |
Week 8 |
Topic: Tools for Accessing and Offering E-learning Readings: Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 6: Web Browsers, Chapter 7: Media Players and Viewers, Chapter 8: Web Servers and Chapter 13: Media Servers. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. |
Week 9 |
Topic: Learning Management Systems, Learning Content Management Systems, and Virtual School Systems Readings: Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 9: Learning Management Systems, Chapter 10: Learning Content Management Systems and Chapter 12: Virtual-School Systems. Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Submit draft of Part III to peer consultant for feedback. |
Week 10 |
Topic: Tools to Develop Online Content Readings: Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 14: Course Authoring Tools, Chapter 15: Web Site Authoring Tools, and Chapter 16: Testing and Assessment Tools Assignment: Respond to discussion activities. Complete feedback on Part III. |
Week 11 |
Topic: Converting Content and Incorporating Multimedia Readings: Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 17: Media Editors and Chapter 18: Content Converters. Assignments: Respond to discussion activities. Complete Part III of the Application Project - E-Learning Plan for Organization and upload to the Gradebook. |
Week 12 |
Topic: Building Online Learning Communities Readings: Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 11: Collaboration Tools. Assignments: Respond to discussion activities |
Week 13 |
Topic: E-Learning Standards and Trends Readings: Rosenberg, M. J. (2001), Chapter 13: The Future of E-Learning. Horton, W. and Horton, K. (2003), Chapter 22: Standards for E-Learning and Chapter 24: Trends in Technology and Learning Assignments: Respond to discussion activities. Complete Part IV of the Application Project - Response to E-Learning Plan and upload to the Gradebook. |
Learning Strategies
online.fsu.edu/onlinesupport/student/assistance/.
Please call (850) 644-8004 for any problems with course websites.
Role of the Instructor
The role of the instructor is to guide the progress of the course, participate in the discussion, provide feedback and evaluate assignments. The instructor will maintain office hours via phone and the Online Office in the Discussion function found in Blackboard.
Expectations and Participation
Class members will be doing all of their work for this course using the BlackBoard learning management system (LMS). Ongoing weekly activities include reading, writing, and participating in discussions. Below are some frequently asked questions about participation in discussion boards and guidelines for writing discussion responses.
How often should I log on to the Discussion Boards?
In order to avoid being overwhelmed by the number of discussion postings, students are expected to log on at least four times per week to respond to the discussion and read discussion posts. Each class member will be required to submit a substantive main response to the question and at least 2 substantive responses to peer main postings. In addition, each class member must respond to questions that peers and the instructor may ask them in response to their main posting.
Class members must support their position when posting to the discussion. Simply saying "hello" or "I agree" is not considered a substantive contribution. At the same time, however, short comments are a natural part of any discussion-you won't be penalized for this-but in terms of your participation grade these type of comments will not be counted toward the minimum discussion requirements.
The class week officially begins Monday at 12:01 AM and ends the following Sunday at midnight. However, each week's discussion questions will be posted the Friday before the week begins. Class members will have from that Friday through Wednesday midnight to contribute their primary responses to the discussion questions. Response to peer postings should be posted by Friday midnight. Class members have until Sunday midnight to respond to any questions posed by peers and the instructor. After that time the discussion will be closed and graded. Class members are expected to participate throughout the week, and to not wait until the last minute to contribute postings.
What is a post?
A post is a message in the Discussions area. It is simply your part of the
conversation about a particular topic. A post may be a question, response
to a question, or a comment.
How long should my posts be?
It is recommended that you keep your posts focused and succinct. This
makes your post easier for others to read and respond to. A good general
rule for length is ˝ to 1 page of writing (125 to 250 words) for a
substantial post. Of course, in some discussions, it may be more
appropriate to write a series of very short posts, rather than one or two
longer ones. You may wish to compose your posts in a word processor then
copy and paste them to a discussion throughout the week. The main idea
here is that the discussion board should be a conversational academic
discussion! In other words, it's okay, and quite natural, to make short
and long posts.
What constitutes a good online
discussion post?
The following factors have been identified as necessary for a good
response in online discussion. Please keep these factors in mind when
composing your posts.
Posts should be:
What is "netiquette"?
Netiquette refers to how you participate in online exchanges. Here are
some examples of good netiquette:
General Guidelines for Written Assignments
Directions for Uploading Assignments to the Gradebook
Every student will submit their application projects, journal critiques, and other assignments by way of the "Assignment Gradebook" attachment, located in each weekly folder (go to 'Assignments' link). To use the "Assignment Gradebook" attachment, select the 'view/complete' link. From there you can read the details for that assignment. Once you complete the assignment then each student will then attach their file and send their completed work through the same link.
Once the assignments are graded, each student can view their respective grade by accessing the "Student Tools" function then go into view grades.
IMPORTANT: DO NOT put any spaces, or special characters (i.e. !, @, #, $, %, ^, &, *) in your saved fine name. There is a glitch within Blackboard which does not allow the instructor to open and view your files.
Incorrect File name: JC#2.Bulls (no special characters)
Incorrect File name: JC 2.Bulls (no spaces)
Correct File name: JC2.Bulls
Case Studies
Class members will examine two case studies that represent actual examples of E-Learning implementations. Each case study analysis should be written from the perspective of a training manager, integrates course materials and discuss how important concepts or theories apply in each case.
Application Project
Class members will complete one application project which is designed to link theory to practice. This project consists of four parts described below. Upon completion of each section of the project, class members will upload his or her completed work to the Gradebook function on Black board.
Part 1 |
Organizational Description Class members will describe an organization of their choice, providing a brief history of the organization, an organizational chart of key management, and a description of the training function and its role in the organization. |
Part 2 |
Application to Organization Using the organizational description from Part 1, class members will "apply" to their top three choices of organizations (other than the one they wrote). Their application must include a description of their e-learning experience and an articulation of their e-learning philosophy. |
Part 3 |
E-Learning Plan for Organization The class member "hired" as the training manager for each organization will work with the original writer of the organization description to research the organizational needs further. Based upon this information, the training manager will develop a plan of action and recommendations for the implementation of E-Learning as appropriate for the organization. Perceived barriers, suggested workarounds, recommended tools, strategies and standards for course development should be included in the plan. Minimum length: 20 pages. |
Part 4 |
Response to E-Learning Plan The originator of the organizational description will write a 5 page response to the E-Learning Plan that analyzes the plan and identifies problems/issues with the plan, including a discussion of E-Learning trends that may impact the plan. |
|
Grade of Incomplete
Incomplete grades are to be given only to students who have been regularly submitting assignments and who have completed most of the work for the course, and who have a serious emergency near the end of the term. An incomplete is a privilege to be decided by the instructor, not a right exercised by the student.
Cheating is defined as the attempt, successful or not, to give or obtain aid and/or information by illicit means in meeting any academic requirements, including examinations. Cheating includes falsifying reports and documents.
Plagiarism is defined as the use, without proper acknowledgements, of the ideas, phrases, sentences, or larger units of discourse from another writer or speaker. Plagiarism includes the unauthorized copying of software and the violation of copyright laws. See campus.fsu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_id=_107_1 for a review of issues associated with plagiarism and the Internet.
Class members are on notice that the instructor will randomly check written submissions for plagiarism. Several tools are available for this purpose (Turnitin.com), and FSU policies regarding cheating and plagiarism will be strictly enforced.
Class members with disabilities requiring an academic accommodation should (1) register with and provide documentation to the Student Resource Center (SDRC), (2) bring a letter to the first week of class. This and other class materials are available in alternative format upon request.
Allen, M. W. (2003). I Had No Idea: How to Build Creative E-Learning Experiences. Educational Technology, 43(6), 15-20.
Bielawski, L. and Metcalf, D. (2003). Blended eLearning. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, Inc.
Boettcher, J. V. and Conrad, R. M. (2004). Faculty Guide to Moving Teaching and Learning to the Web (2nd Ed.). Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.
Foxon, M., Richey, R., Roberts, R., Spannaus, T. (2003). Training Manager Competencies, The Standards. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
Glenn, J. M. (2003). E-Learning E-volution: Your (Digital) Future Awaits. Business Education Forum, 57(4), 8-15.
Gold, M. (2003). 8 Lessons about E-Learning from 5 Organizations. Training and Development, 57(8) , 54-57.
Harris, P. (2003). ROI of E-Learning: Closing in. Training and Development, 57(2), 30-36.
Hartley, D. (2000). On-Demand Learning: Training in the New Millennium. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, Inc.
Henderson, A. J. (2003). The e-learning Question and Answer Book: A Survival Guide for Traingers and Business Managers. New York, NY: AMACOM.
Horton, W. (2003). Using E-Learning. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
Mealy, L. and Loller, B. (2000). E-Learning: Expanding the Training Classroom through Technology. Chicago, IL: International Association for Human Resource Information Management.
Phillips, J. and Pope, C. (2001). Implementing E-Learning Solutions. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
Prendergast, G. (2004). Blended Collaborative Learning: Online Teaching of Online Educators. Global Educator Newsletter. Access at www.globaled.com/articles/GerardPrendergast2004.pdf
Rosenberg, M. (2003). Redefining E-Learning. Performance Improvement, 42(3), 38-41.
Rossett, A. (2002). The ASTD E-Learning Handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Rossett, A., Douglis, F., Frazee, R. Strategies for Building Blended Learning. Access at www.learningcircuits.org/2003/jul2003/rossett.htm
Russell, D., Calvey, D., Banks, M. (2003). Creating New Learning Communities: Towards Effective E-Learning Production. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(1), 34-44.
Sloman, M. (2002). The E-Learning Revolution: How Technology is Driving a New Training Paradigm. New York, NY: AMACOM.
Trentin, G.. (2003). Managing the Complexity of E-Learning Systems. Educational Technology, 43(6), 36-42.
Tyler, K. (2002). Take E-Learning to the next step: E-learning programs move beyond online catalogs to individual assessments and professional development plans. HR Magazine. Access at: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3495/is_2_47/ai_83058911
Adult Education and Human Resource Development Program
Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
114 Stone Building - Tallahassee, FL 32306-4452
Phone: (850) 644-8165 ♦ Fax: (850) 644-6401
E-mail: adult-ed@garnet.acns.fsu.edu