Region 1 |
Region 2 |
Region 3 |
Region 4 |
Region 5
RPDAC Directory |
Work Plan |
Meetings |
Upcoming Calendar |
Homework Assignments |
Mailing List
Contact Person:
Cyndi Godbey (clg5723@garnet.acns.fsu.edu)
REGION 2
4 - 30 - 99 Meeting Minutes
Third Meeting
Regional Professional Development Advisory Council
St. John's River Community College
St. Augustine, Florida
Friday, April 30, 1999
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
- I. Welcome and Introductions
Chairman Lyndarae Martin called the meeting to order at 10:20 a.m.
Chairman Martin asked those present to introduce themselves.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
- Lou Bethea, Clay District Schools
- Glenna Kyker, PEG - Union Correctional Institute
- Lyndarae Martin, St. Johns River Community College
- Jane Murray, Learn to Read of St. Johns County
- Julie Falt for Pat Smittle, Santa Fe Community College
- Marilynn Stevenson, Florida Community College at Jacksonville
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:
- Ray Fleck, Business representative
- Samuel Lauff, Marion County Schools
- Tim Mahler, Florida Department of Corrections
- Dianne Westcott, Suwanee-Hamilton Area Vocational Technical and
Adult Center
GUESTS PRESENT:
- Beverly Collins, ITEC- Employment Services
- Ernie Matthews, Adult Education- St. Augustine Technology
- Karen A. Soukiasian, David Dobbs
- Marty Mayor, Clay District Schools
- Robert H. Franck, VAW
- Venessa Fairbrain, ITEC- Employment Resource Consultant
FSU TEAM MEMBERS PRESENT:
- Peter Easton, Principle Investigator
- Cynthia Godbey, Project Director
- Gary Liebert, Research Assistant
DOE TEAM MEMBERS PRESENT:
- Teresa Bestor, Regional Consultant - Region 2
- John Denmark, Regional Director - Region 2
-
Dr. Peter Easton announced that the project has a presentation scheduled
for the Florida Literacy Conference on May 12 and asked for volunteers to
participate.
-
Updated Council Directory was
disseminateD.
-
Dr. Easton reviewed the status of Region II's progress in the project
to
provide some background for the discussion of objectives for the meeting.
He referred to the diagram depicting the First Year Implementation
Strategy for ADE 21 Project where the following phases are illustrated:
| Phase I |
Establishment of the RPDAC |
| Phase II |
The conduct of a needs and resources
assessment |
| Phase III |
- Training facilitation
- Policy advocacy
|
| Phase IV |
- Transfer of training assessment
- Review of lessons learned through system change efforts
|
| Phase V |
Year 1 evaluation and Year 2 planning |
- Dr. Easton elaborated on the task of Constituency Development and he
also stressed the importance of the selection of a regional technical
support institution. The intent is that the Council would select a
regionally based technical support institution that can serve as the
technical support backstop in future years as FSU steps out of that role.
- John Denmark indicated that DOE expects that a needs and resources
assessment will be completed by the end of the first year. Dr. Easton
pointed out that the Region 2 Council has taken the "temperature" of the
needs, resources, barriers and best practices in the region.
II. Review of Second Meeting
- Dr. Kyker indicated that, although she can serve as a liaison to a
variety of groups in the community, she needs to be designated as
representing PEG in the minutes. There being no further changes, the
minutes from the March 29, 1999 Region 2 RPDAC were adopted as amended.
- Issues about Clarification of Roles of Council Members were discussed.
The issue was raised as to whether the representation of constituency
groups on the Region 2 Council is really adequate. It was pointed out that
the group could compile this information using the Sampling Matrix.
III. Old Business
- Cyndi Godbey disseminated a compilation of the information that had
been gathered prior to the last meeting regarding needs assessment. Jane
Murray shared information that she had gathered from CBO's from around the
state who provide adult education.
- Regarding the Local Workforce Development Issues, the visitors were
introduced: Beverly Collins and Vanessa Fairbrain introduced themselves as
Transitional Services Coordinators for ITEC; Robert Franck (Bob) was at a
technical center and then went back in industry for one of the largest
employers in St Johns County; Karen Soukiasian; and Ernie Matthews, of St.
Augustine Technology. The visitors discussed the current job market
situation and what is needed on the job. The visitors made it clear that
what adult education needs to do is focus on performance-based training of
students that is connected to real expectations and consequences.
IV. New Business
- Dr. Easton pointed out that Performance Consulting takes a different
approach to addressing performance problems. In this field, practitioners
address the following issues:
- What is the performance problem? What can't people do that they
need to do to get what we/they want?
- Why is this a performance problem? To what degree is it due to:
- lack of training/knowledge;
- lack of financial/material support;
- inappropriate technology; or
- policy barriers.
- What strategy will minimally address all the chief obstacles?
What role, if any, does training play in it?
- Dr. Easton asked whether the group still agreed that work force
readiness of the student should be the theme. The group affirmed this
choice, adding that goal setting should be a part of the curriculum.
- Dr. Martin pointed out that the issue is more how to do the training
so that the teachers incorporate the workforce readiness skills training.
- There was discussion about what is meant by workforce readiness.
Members indicated that it consists of things such as:
how to dress
how to interview
job search strategies
resume
communication skills
workforce culture
what are the job expectations
- Dr. Easton summarized the Council members' input as suggesting two
packages:
- Package A: Student Instructional Strategy
- Package B: How do you get teachers/administrators to do that.
He pointed out that given the time frame, the group may need to survey
quickly what curriculum is already out there, adapt that but really focus
on doing package B the first year. It was pointed out that package B is
the more important.
- There was discussion about the selection criteria for the regional
lead
institution. Dr. Martin suggested that the group consider forming a
consortium of institutions, each of which could contribute resources to
support the first year trainings. Dr. Martin asked that the Project Team
do a one page summary conceptualizing the consortia.
- The group agreed that Regionally Based Training should be held in July
and the third in August.
V. Close Meeting
|